Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 01:14

Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Report: Suns, Kevin Durant’s representatives sorting through multiple trade offers - NBC Sports
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Eufy’s Omni C20 mopping robovac is $300 off for a limited time - The Verge
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Royals Promote Jac Caglianone - MLB Trade Rumors
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Xbox Surprises Users With Free Copy of One of its Biggest Games - ComicBook.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
What are some downsides to living in Newfoundland and Labrador (besides the weather)?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.